WEBVTT
00:00:01.360 --> 00:00:04.180
Let’s take a look at ordering rational numbers.
00:00:06.210 --> 00:00:11.450
But before we do that, I wanna pause quickly and remind us what rational numbers are.
00:00:13.250 --> 00:00:17.400
All of the numbers found on this chart are rational numbers.
00:00:17.750 --> 00:00:23.280
Rational numbers are positive and negative numbers that can be written as a fraction.
00:00:23.370 --> 00:00:28.570
So any number that can be written in a fraction form is considered a rational number.
00:00:30.630 --> 00:00:34.950
And without further ado, we’re gonna talk about ordering rational numbers.
00:00:35.430 --> 00:00:39.750
Today we’re gonna focus on numbers that are already written in fraction form.
00:00:41.850 --> 00:00:42.740
Here’s an example.
00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:45.610
Order these values from least to greatest.
00:00:46.860 --> 00:00:51.830
We have sixth-eighths, two-eighths, five-eighths, three-eighths.
00:00:53.100 --> 00:00:59.700
What you should’ve noticed immediately when you saw these values is that they have the same denominator.
00:01:01.970 --> 00:01:06.970
And that is good news when it comes to ordering values from least to greatest.
00:01:08.440 --> 00:01:17.170
Since these fractions have the same denominator, ordering them from least to greatest is as simple as comparing their numerators.
00:01:19.140 --> 00:01:22.520
Let’s remember that we’re working from least to greatest.
00:01:23.350 --> 00:01:25.440
So we find the smallest numerator.
00:01:25.620 --> 00:01:29.590
And that’s gonna be our least value here, the two-eighths.
00:01:31.230 --> 00:01:44.650
From there, we’ll have three-eighths as the next largest value and then five-eighths and, finally, the greatest value in this set, six-eighths.
00:01:45.900 --> 00:01:49.580
Here’s a picture to help you visualize what’s happening here.
00:01:50.960 --> 00:01:54.060
Imagine if four people ordered a personal pizza.
00:01:54.380 --> 00:01:57.820
And each personal pizza was cut into eight slices.
00:01:59.380 --> 00:02:11.890
Since each person’s pizza is cut into eight slices and the slices are the same size, to find out who ate the most, we only need to ask who had the most slices of pizza.
00:02:13.260 --> 00:02:16.780
Two, three, five, and then six slices.
00:02:18.730 --> 00:02:19.960
Here’s our next example.
00:02:20.420 --> 00:02:27.410
Order these values from greatest to least: one-twelfth, one-tenth, one-third, and one-twentieth.
00:02:29.200 --> 00:02:33.760
Something slightly different is happening here than in the last example.
00:02:35.740 --> 00:02:41.410
This time, each of our values has the same numerator instead of the same denominator.
00:02:42.950 --> 00:02:44.590
So what does that mean for us?
00:02:45.110 --> 00:02:47.750
How can we compare these values?
00:02:48.670 --> 00:02:50.680
Well, we could draw a picture.
00:02:52.300 --> 00:02:54.610
Well, we could draw a picture.
00:02:56.350 --> 00:03:09.180
If we drew a picture, we would need to divide the first rectangle into 12 pieces, the second one into 10 pieces, the third one into three pieces, and the fourth one into 20 pieces.
00:03:11.020 --> 00:03:12.710
It might look something like this.
00:03:15.030 --> 00:03:23.320
What we notice here is the more pieces we divide our whole into, the smaller the pieces get.
00:03:24.750 --> 00:03:31.900
If we tried to divide one chocolate bar into 20 pieces, the pieces would be really small.
00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:40.360
However, if we divided that same chocolate bar in only three pieces, the pieces are much bigger.
00:03:43.870 --> 00:03:54.500
What I’m trying to get you to see here is when the numerators are the same, fractions with smaller denominators represent more of the whole.
00:03:55.950 --> 00:03:59.300
Here we’re trying to move from greatest to least.
00:04:00.240 --> 00:04:03.360
One-third is the greatest value here.
00:04:04.820 --> 00:04:12.600
Sharing one chocolate bar with three people is going to work out better for you than sharing one chocolate bar with 20 people.
00:04:14.280 --> 00:04:21.190
So after one-third comes one-tenth and then one-twelfth.
00:04:22.680 --> 00:04:27.150
And finally, the least value out of these four is one-twentieth.
00:04:29.440 --> 00:04:30.620
Here’s our next example.
00:04:31.180 --> 00:04:40.930
Order these values from least to greatest: eight-halves, eight-fourths, eight-sixths, eight-fifths.
00:04:42.060 --> 00:04:45.370
So first you notice that they have the same numerator.
00:04:47.630 --> 00:04:55.990
This means that the fractions divided into more pieces, or the ones with the larger denominator, will have a smaller value.
00:04:57.880 --> 00:05:03.220
You also remember that this is true as long as the numerators are the same.
00:05:04.760 --> 00:05:09.100
Moving forward, you check that we’re moving from least to greatest.
00:05:10.820 --> 00:05:18.540
Since we’re looking for the fraction that represents the least value, we’re going to try and find the highest denominator.
00:05:20.280 --> 00:05:36.010
Here, that’s eight-sixths, followed by eight-fifths and then eight-fourths and, finally, eight-halves representing the greatest of these four values.
00:05:37.810 --> 00:05:39.210
Here’s our last example.
00:05:39.820 --> 00:05:48.690
Order these values from least to greatest: seven-tenths, six-fourths, four-fifths, and five-halves.
00:05:49.810 --> 00:05:54.710
Immediately, we notice that this example is different from all the ones we’ve seen.
00:05:56.150 --> 00:05:58.820
This time, there’re no common numerators.
00:05:59.110 --> 00:06:04.430
There’re also no common denominators, and this is a problem.
00:06:06.850 --> 00:06:11.320
We might say this is a problem of trying to compare apples and oranges.
00:06:13.460 --> 00:06:17.050
It’s impossible to compare these in their current state.
00:06:17.270 --> 00:06:28.850
And therefore, to order them, we need to find some kind of format for these four values that makes it easier for us to compare and order them.
00:06:30.060 --> 00:06:32.670
And you have a few options.
00:06:34.170 --> 00:06:36.730
You could try and find the least common denominator.
00:06:38.270 --> 00:06:39.880
You could also draw a picture.
00:06:42.340 --> 00:06:45.560
You could convert the fractions to decimals.
00:06:47.590 --> 00:06:51.610
I’m gonna choose to solve this one by converting these fractions to decimals.
00:06:52.880 --> 00:06:59.780
Seven-tenths is one of those fractions that’s a power of 10, so it converts to 0.7.
00:07:00.540 --> 00:07:05.020
To convert six-fourths to decimals, you can divide six by four.
00:07:06.980 --> 00:07:13.040
That process would look something like this, leaving you with the answer of 1.5.
00:07:14.100 --> 00:07:23.160
To convert four-fifths to decimal format, I first convert this to an equivalent fraction with a base of 10.
00:07:24.790 --> 00:07:30.130
Eight-tenths is written as 0.8 in decimal format.
00:07:31.300 --> 00:07:35.540
I’m gonna follow that same procedure for five-halves.
00:07:36.460 --> 00:07:44.830
When I do that, I get twenty-five tenths, which in decimal format is 2.5.
00:07:44.830 --> 00:07:50.510
Okay, we’re no longer trying to compare apples to oranges.
00:07:50.770 --> 00:07:53.090
Now we have a format that we can work with.
00:07:54.220 --> 00:07:57.650
We’re trying to order these from least to greatest.
00:07:58.980 --> 00:08:02.010
Seven-tenths is the smallest value.
00:08:03.080 --> 00:08:06.920
After that is 0.8 or four-fifths.
00:08:08.290 --> 00:08:10.780
Six-fourths comes next.
00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:15.810
And the greatest of these four values is five-halves.
00:08:18.060 --> 00:08:19.920
Now you’re ready to try some on your own.